🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

Latvia's parliament members have decided to withdraw from an global treaty created to safeguard women from violence, including domestic abuse, following extensive and intense debates in the legislature.

Thousands of demonstrators gathered in Riga this past week to oppose the decision. The ultimate authority now lies with Head of State Edgars Rinkevics, who must determine whether to approve or veto the proposed law.

Referred to as the European treaty, the 2011 agreement only became active in Latvia last twelve months ago, requiring authorities to develop legal frameworks and assistance programs to end all forms of violence.

Latvia has become the initial European Union member to initiate the procedure of withdrawing from the treaty. The transcontinental nation withdrew in two years ago, a move that human rights organizations described as a significant regression for women's rights.

Ideological Controversy and Opposition

The international agreement was approved by the EU in last year, yet conservative groups have contended that its focus on equal rights weakens traditional families and promotes what they term "gender ideology".

Following a thirteen-hour discussion in the Saeima, MPs voted by a margin of 56-32 to exit from the treaty, a action proposed by opposition parties but backed by representatives from one of the three governing partners.

The result represents a setback for moderate conservative Prime Minister Evika Silina, who stood with protesters outside the legislature earlier this seven-day period. "We will not surrender, we will continue fighting so that violence does not triumph," she stated to the crowd.

Ideological Disagreements and Responses

One of the main parties advocating for the withdrawal is a nationalist party, whose leader has called on citizens to choose between what he terms a "natural family" and "non-binary concepts with multiple sexes".

Latvia's ombudswoman the rights official appealed for the treaty not to be politicized, while the organization the rights organization stated it was "not a danger to national principles, it served as a tool to achieve them".

The recent decision has provoked widespread protest both within the country and abroad.

Twenty-two thousand people have endorsed a Latvian appeal calling for the convention to be maintained. The gender equality group the rights center has announced a protest for next Thursday, charging MPs of disregarding the will of the Latvian people.

International Worries and Potential Future Actions

The leader of the Council of Europe's parliamentary assembly commented that the Baltic state had made a rash choice driven by misinformation. He described it as an "unprecedented and deeply concerning regression for female equality and fundamental freedoms in Europe".

He noted that since the transcontinental nation abandoned the convention in 2021, cases of gender-based killings and violence against women had increased significantly.

Because the vote did not achieve a supermajority majority, the head of state could potentially send back the legislation for additional consideration if he has objections.

President Rinkevics stated on social media that he would assess the decision according to legal requirements, "considering governmental and judicial factors, rather than ideological or political viewpoints".

Recently, another member of the ruling coalition, the Progressives, indicated it would not exclude appealing to the Constitutional Court.

"This decision represents a concerning situation for women's rights not only in Latvia but throughout the continent," commented a human rights activist.

• Domestic abuse statistics have been rising in multiple EU countries
• The Istanbul Convention mandates specific safeguards for victims of domestic abuse
• Latvia's decision could affect comparable debates in additional EU countries