Fortnite Game Fans Voice Frustration Over New Sidekick Pets and Alleged Greed

A number of Fortnite enthusiasts are experiencing let down, and this isn't because of the latest virtual happenings. Fortnite's current limited-time event, which brings a Simpsons-themed map, also rolled out a brand-new feature known as sidekicks. It's impossible to deny that the new companions are adorable. However, the associated prices have made numerous fans stunned at this developer's attempts to monetize almost each aspect of the game.

Understanding Companion Pets?

Sidekicks are essentially similar to digital creatures, though having a few limitations. You can give them a name, and they will accompany you throughout a match. They are indestructible, and you can pet them. Opposing gamers outside the player's party are unable to view sidekicks β€” and showing off your companions is arguably a big part of the enjoyment of owning them. Sidekicks are able to be outfitted with outfits and emotes, but the debate centers on their appearance. Each pet's overall design is only able to be altered once, at which point that selection is permanent. You can choose a sidekick's fur shade, secondary colors, iris tones, pattern, and its build size.

A Costly Personalization Mechanism

Should a player afterward decide that they'd like your pet to look a bit altered, it's not possible to simply further modify its look. Players must buy a new companion. And, these pets aren't inexpensive. Most people are obtaining the Peels pet, since it's packaged in the current battle pass. According to unofficial reports, upcoming sidekicks could cost from 1,000 to 1,500 V-Bucks; to put that in perspective, 1,000 V-Bucks costs $8.99 and 2,800 V-Bucks cost $22.99. However, players can change the name of a companion as many times as they want.

Player Reaction and Comparisons

Most sidekicks haven't been formally released so far, so the cost could well change. Yet regardless of whether the developer makes companions more affordable, a lot of the anger stems from the fact that players might need to spend for a one type of sidekick more than once. To certain players, the cost structure feels particularly egregious considering the game has previously added pets that ride around inside backpack accessories. Back bling pets do not have a customization limitation and can be seen by other players in the match. Backpack buddies can't be named or use emotes, however other gamers can sometimes interact with them β€” and this is better than remaining invisible altogether.

The absence of unique functions and restricted interaction choices have many players feeling disappointed. For instance, why is it not possible to you, such as, interact playfully with their fancy fruit-themed pet? A few note that companions do not always stay close with the user if a match is moving quickly, or mention that the banana pet takes up two slots in the reward system β€” which reinforces the notion that the developer is pressuring players for money. Greedy is a term that's coming up often in these conversations, with some comparing sidekick monetization to other intense pricing schemes in titles like popular sports games. Additionally, it adds to the issue that certain sidekicks are expected to be pricier than their character skin versions.

"We urge you to avoid purchasing Companion Pets," pleads one popular community thread that advises fellow players to figuratively express disapproval by not spending.

"I know these pets are adorable," the thread continues, "we realize they are enjoyable. I know we have all been anticipating them. However the greed on display is unacceptable and should not be rewarded."

The Broader Context of In-Game Purchases

In recent years, Fortnite's events and partnerships have grown in scale and ambition, but the no-cost-to-start title still needs to earn income. Therefore, the total quantity of cosmetics users can now purchase has grown almost overwhelming. Beyond standard items like back blings, deployment tools, pickaxes, and emotes, players might potentially spend money on shoes, songs, instruments, building blocks, vehicles, wheels, custom paint jobs, seasonal rewards, and a membership. Companion pets not only require money, but also bring in a host of new revenue avenues for the developer. It is likely, users will soon be able to spend for items like sidekick looks, outfits, gestures, and additional engagement options.

All of such cosmetics are entirely voluntary and unneeded to enjoy the game, but gear can nonetheless affect your community experience. Younger players, for example, sometimes encounter teasing for not wearing impressive enough outfits. A comparable issue previously occurred when the developer launched brand-name kicks, which can range from 600 to 1,000 V-Bucks. That footwear cost model wasn't well received either, and some fans promised that they wouldn't succumb to the temptation at the time. However in the end, buying shoes grew normalized. Today, sidekicks are additionally testing the boundaries of how much a gamer could be prepared to pay to stand out within the player base.

What is Ahead for Companion Pets?

Sidekicks are still a relatively recent feature, and they're part of a title that changes regularly. Some players are sharing that they've gotten a survey that assesses how people feel about pet mechanics and monetization, which could potentially indicate that the developer's strategy are remain fluid. But if the game shoes are a sign, companions likely will not get more affordable in general β€” there will just be a broader range of prices to shop.

Ultimately, while certain individuals are raging at the game shop prices, different players are experiencing only joy for their new battle royale friends.

Christine Dawson
Christine Dawson

An experienced educator and tech enthusiast passionate about transforming learning through innovation.